O estado da arte em finanças comportamentais: um estudo bibliométrico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2133Palavras-chave:
Viés Cognitivo, Economia Comportamental, Processo Decisório, BibliometriaResumo
A presente pesquisa teve por objetivo conhecer o campo de estudo em Finanças Comportamentais, através de uma revisão das principais produções científicas existentes sobre o tema. Para atingir o objetivo proposto realizou-se uma revisão bibliométrica dos estudos indexados na base de dados Web of Science®. A amostra envolveu 1002 artigos registrados entre 1967 a 2021. Os resultados apontaram como os autores mais influentes da amostra, Kahneman, Bickel, Thaler, Hursh, Fama e Tversky. Os anos que apresentaram maior volume de publicações foram 2016, 2018, 2019 e 2020, demonstrando a atualidade do tema e crescente interesse dos pesquisadores sobre a temática. Em síntese, percebe-se que o campo das Finanças Comportamentais se mostrou como um campo científico crescente e amplo, no qual diversos aspectos têm sido investigados, tais como, a influência das emoções na tomada de decisão, a eficiência do mercado, o impacto do comportamento humano na economia, a relação entre consumo e os vieses cognitivos, dentre outras descobertas que vem promovendo contribuições tanto para a psicologia, quanto para os estudos econômico-financeiros.
Downloads
Referências
Araújo, C. A. (2006). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em questão, 12(1), 11-32.
Araujo, D. R. & Silva, C. A. T. (2007). Aversão à perda nas decisões de risco. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, Brasília, 1(3), 45-62, set./dez. Disponível em: <http://www.repec.org.br/repec/article/view/15/17>. Acesso em: 23 mai. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v1i3.15
Bakker, F.G., Groenewegen, P. & Den Hond, F. (2005). A Bibliometric Analysis Of 30 Years Of Research And Theory On Corporate Social Responsibility And Corporate Social Performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086
Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. (2006). Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making Among the Poor. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 8-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.8
Bickel, W. K., Degrandpre, R. J., Higgins, S. T. & Hughes, J. R. (1990). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sciences, 47(17), 1501-1510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(90)90178-T
Bickel, W. K. & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96(1), 73–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961736.x
Bickel, W. K., Miller, M. L., YI, R., Kowal, B. P., Lindquist, D. M. & Pitcock, J. A. (2007). Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 85-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.016
Camerer, C. & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. In: (Ed.). Advances in Behavioral Economics. New York: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829118
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051053737843
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. (2011). Uma abordagem para detectar, quantificar e visualizar a evolução de um campo de pesquisa: uma aplicação prática para o campo da teoria dos conjuntos difusos. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
Fama, E. F. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00026-9
Garcia, R. & Olak, P. A. (2007). Controladoria comportamental: constatação empírica de tendências de mudanças no paradigma decisorial quantitativo. In: CONGRESSO USP DE CONTROLADORIA E CONTABILIDADE, 7, 2007, São Paulo. Anais [...]. São Paulo: USP.
Glimcher, P. W. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision. Science, 306(5695), 447–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102566
Hursh, S. R. (1984). Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(3), 435–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435
Johnson, H. L. & Cohen, A. M. (1967). Experiments in behavioral economics: Siegel and fouraker revisited. Behavioral Science, 12(5), 353–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830120502
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
Kahneman, D. & Smith, V. (2002). Foundations of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. Nobel Prize in Economics Documents, 1.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risck. Econométrica, 47(2), 263-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
King, C. (2016). Web of Science: 1 billion cited references and counting, 2016. Disponível em: <http://stateofinnovation.thomsonreuters.com/web-of-science-1-billion-cited-references-and-counting>. Acesso em: 15 abr 2021.
Loewenstein, G. (1999). Experimental Economics From the Vantage-point of Behavioural Economics. The Economic Journal, 109(453), 25-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00400
Meho, L. I. & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIES faculty: Web of science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105–2125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677
Platt, M. L. & Huettel, S. A. (2008). Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 398-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2062
Prado, J. W. et al. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: a bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968-2014). Scientometrics, Hungria, 106(3), 1007-1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1829-6
Salamone, J. D. (2009). Dopamine, Behavioral Economics, and Effort. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.08.013.2009
Shiller, R. J. (2003). From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164967
Simon, H. A. (1979). Comportamento administrativo: estudo do processo decisório nas organizações administrativas. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. FGV.
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. In: R. Thaler (ed.), Quasi Rational Economics. Russel Sage Foundation (25-48), 1985. The End of Behavorial Finance. Associaton for Investment Managament and Research.
Thaler, R. H. & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/380085
Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2018). Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.15. University Leiden.
Westbrook, A. & Braver, T. S. (2015). Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 395-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
• 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
• 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
• 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
• 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
• 5. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• 6. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
