Elinor Ostrom's scholarly impact: a scientometric review of a nobel laureate

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2096

Palavras-chave:

Bibliometrics, Ostrom, Economics Nobel, Commons

Resumo

Elinor Ostrom was the first woman ever to win the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences with research in the field of economic governance. In order to map the scientific impact of her work and visualize the collective action from her perspective, this scientometric review was carried out using two groups of analysis. First, we analyzed the works authored or co-authored by Elinor Ostrom. Later, to conceptualize the reach of Ostrom's works and her academic impact we analyzed the documents that cite her. The relevance of this study, as a systematic review of the scientific literature, lies in the fact that it can reveal important information through citation-induced patterns and guide researchers interested in collective action and the commons. The data was collected from the Web of Science and analyzed using a series of software to facilitate the observation of the data with the use of double map overlays, co-citation cluster, timeline views and others with the goal of being able to point out how the research in the area is being directed, the current topics, identify research gaps and interconnections with other fields of science. The results revealed central themes worked by the author and the current themes involved as a legacy of her work. The networks show through clusters the separation of topics that were carried out within the years and identify the most cited groups of authors, as well as the works that relate the most with themselves.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806578

Anderies JM, Janssen MA (2012) Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012): Pioneer in the Interdisciplinary Science of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems. PLoS Biol 10(10): e1001405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001405

Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.011

Araral, E. (2016). Reply to: Design principles in commons science: A response to “Ostrom, Hardin and the commons” (Araral). Environmental Science & Policy, 100(61), 243-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.022

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Baiardi, A. (2011). Elinor Ostrom, a premiação da visão unificada das Ciências Humanas. Caderno CRH, 24(61), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792011000100014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-49792011000100014

Bhattacharyya, P. K., & Sahu, N. B. (2020). Informetric Portrait of Elinor Ostrom, the Nobel Laureate in the Field of Economic Sciences. Journal of Scientometric Research, 9(2), 204-213. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.9.2.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.9.2.25

Bromley, D. W., Mckean, M. A., Gilles, J. L., Oakerson, R. J., & Runge, C. F. (1992). Making the Commons Work: theory, practice and policy.

Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford's law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 224(5223), 953-956. https://doi.org/10.1038/224953a0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224953a0

Capelari, M. G., Calmon, P. C. D. P., & Araújo, S. (2017). Vincent and Elinor Ostrom: two confluent trajectories for the governance of common property resources. Ambiente & Sociedade, 20(1), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20150135r1v2012017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20150135r1v2012017

Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive Knowledge Domain Visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA, 101 (suppl.), 5303-5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317

Chen, C. (2017) Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science 2 (2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006

Chen, C. (2018). Eugene Garfield’s scholarly impact: A scientometric review. Scientometrics, 114(2), 489-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2594-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2594-5

Chen, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Patterns of connections and movements in dual‐map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 65(2), 334-351. https:/doi.org/10.1002/asi.22968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22968

Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., Tseng, H. (2012) Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinions on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593-608. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507

Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309

Clarivate Analytics (2021) Web of Science Web Site. Available at: https://www.webofscience.com/

Cox, M., Gurney, G., Anderies, J., Coleman, E., Darling, E., Epstein, G., Frey, U., Nenadovic, M., Schlager, E., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2021). Lessons learned from synthetic research projects based on the Ostrom Workshop frameworks. Ecology and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12092-260117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12092-260117

Cox, M., Villamayor-Tomas, S., & Arnold, G. (2016). Design principles in commons science: A response to “Ostrom, Hardin and the commons” (Araral). Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 238-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.020

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907-1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015

Francisco, E. D. R. (2011). RAE-eletrônica: exploration of archive in the light of bibliometrics, geoanalysis and social network. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 51(3), 280-306, https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902011000300008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902011000300008

Gibson, C. C., Mckean, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2000). People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. Mit Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5286.001.0001

Gordon, H. S. (1954). The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. In Journal of Political Economy, 62(2): 124–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/257497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/257497

Guedes, V. L., & Borschiver, S. (2005). Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. In Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação, 6(1), 18.

Guha-Khasnobis, B., Kanbur, R. & Ostrom, E. (2006). Linking the formal and informal economy: concepts and policies. OUP Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199204764.001.0001

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (p. 24). Cambridge, MA: MIT press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001

Lam, Wai Fung. (1998). Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies, ICS Press.

Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., ... & Taylor, W. W. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513-1516. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004

Macias-Chapula, C. A. (1998). O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional. Ciência da informação, 27(2), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19651998000200005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19651998000200005

McGinnis, M. D. (2011). An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x

Merino Pérez, L. (2014). Perspectivas sobre la gobernanza de los bienes y la ciudadanía en la obra de Elinor Ostrom. Revista mexicana de sociología, 76(SPE), 77-104.

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Nolen, J. L. (2021) "Elinor Ostrom". Encyclopedia Britannica, 3 Aug. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Elinor-Ostrom. Accessed 8 January 2022.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard economic studies. v. 124). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf3ts DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf3ts

Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public choice, 48(1), 3-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239556

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World development, 24(6), 1073-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X

Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of economic perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739

Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences, 104(39), 15181-15187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104

Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American economic review, 100(3), 641-72. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641

Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global environmental change, 20(4), 550-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004

Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278-282. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5412.278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5412.278

Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Walker, J. M., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9739

Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American political science Review, 86(2), 404-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1964229

Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.2307/974676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/974676

Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. American political science review, 55(4), 831-842. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400125973

Pinto, C. F., Serra, F. R., & Ferreira, M. P. (2014). A bibliometric study on culture research in International Business. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 11(3), 340-363, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2014309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2014309

Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835157

Prado, J.W., de Castro Alcântara, V., de Melo Carvalho, F. et al. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: a bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968–2014). Scientometrics 106, 1007–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1829-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1829-6

Ramos, G. M. P. D., de Muylder, C. F., & Freire, D. A. L. (2014). The craftsman and entrepreneurship: a bibliometric study of academic production in enanpad events from 1999 to 2008. In Revista Metropolitana de Sustentabilidade (ISSN 2318-3233), 4(1), 76-94.

Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397

Romanelli, J. P., & Boschi, R. S. (2020). The legacy of Elinor Ostrom on common forests research assessed through bibliometric analysis. Cerne, 25, 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201925042658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201925042658

Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land economics, 249-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375

Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and collective action: Self-governance in irrigation. ICS press.

Tarko, V. (2017). Elinor Ostrom: An Intellectual Biography. Rowan & LittleField.

Teixeira Cruz, E. S., Pereira, J. R., Cruz, A. O., Garcia, A. S. (2018). Gestão da água como common pool resource: revisão integrativa a partir de Elinor Ostrom. Proceedings of XXI SEMEAD Seminários em Administração, 21, São Paulo.

Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2014). CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 802-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006

Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ciência da Informação, 31(2), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652002000200016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652002000200016

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Downloads

Publicado

2023-05-03

Como Citar

Felizardo, L. F., Machado, N. R. C., do Carmo, G., do Prado, J. W., & Pereira, J. R. (2023). Elinor Ostrom’s scholarly impact: a scientometric review of a nobel laureate. Revista De Gestão E Secretariado, 14(5), 7047–7081. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2096

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)