A classificação das distâncias e agrupamentos de diversos elementos musicais através de três métodos de avaliação de similaridades desenvolvidos na psicologia cognitiva: Modelo de Contraste, Alinhamento Estrutural e Transformação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v15i4.3697Palavras-chave:
Similaridades, Distâncias, AgrupamentosResumo
O estudo tem como objetivo utilizar três métodos de avaliação de similaridades desenvolvidos na psicologia cognitiva na classificação das distâncias e agrupamentos dos acordes diatônicos nas tonalidades maior e menor, levando em consideração as quatro escalas tonais (Jônio, Eólio, Menor Harmônica e Menor Melódica), das vinte e quatro tonalidades, também levando em consideração as quatro escalas tonais, das quarenta e oito séries do Concerto para Violino de Alban Berg e de alguns conjuntos representantes de escalas na teoria musical. Os métodos empregados são: o Modelo de Contraste, que pondera as características comuns e distintas entre os objetos comparados (Tversky 1977); o Alinhamento Estrutural, que classifica as similaridades através da distinção entre dois tipos de diferenças e dois tipos de comunalidades (Gentner; Markman 1995, 1997; Goldstone 1994; Markman; Gentner 1990, 1993a, 1993b, 1993c, 1996); e a Transformação, que avalia as similaridades através do número de operações necessárias para transformar um objeto em outro (Chater; Hahn 1997; Hahn; Chater; Richardson 2003; Hahn; Richardson; Chater 2001).
Downloads
Referências
Almada, Carlos. 2009. Harmonia Funcional. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.
Bassok, Miriam. 1990. Transfer of Domain-Specific Problem-Solving Procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, v.16, p. 522-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.16.3.522
Bernstein, David W. 2002. Nineteenth-Century Harmonic Theory: the Austro-German Legacy. In: Christensen, Thomas (Ed.). The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, p. 778-811. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521623711.027
Bharucha, Jamshed; Krumhansl, Carol Lynne. 1983. The Representation of Harmonic Structure in Music: Hierarchies of Stability as a Function of Context. Cognition, v. 13, p. 63-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90003-3
Chater, Nick. 1999. The Search for Simplicity: A Fundamental Cognitive Principle? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, v. 52A, n. 2, p. 273-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/027249899391070
Chater, Nick; Hahn, Ulrike. 1997. Representational Distortion, Similarity and the Universal Law of Generalization. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorization, p. 31-36. University of Edinburg.
Chediak, Almir. 1986. Harmonia e Improvisação (2 volumes). Rio de Janeiro: Lumiar.
Christensen, Thomas (Ed.). 2002. The Cambridge Western Music Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521623711
Dubovsky, I; Evceiev, S.; Spossobin, I; Sokolov, V. 2018 [1937]. Manual de Harmonia. Tradução de Silvio Merhy da 4ª Edição [1955]. Goiás/Alto Paraiso: Fênix – Projeto Editorial.
Forte, Allen. 1973. The Structure of Atonal Music. Yale University Press.
Forte, Allen. 1974 [1962]. Tonal Harmony in Concept and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gauldin, Robert. 2004. Harmonic Practice in Tonal Music. 2ªedition. New York: W. W. Norton.
Gentner, Dedre. 1983. Structure-Mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, v. 7, p. 155-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
Gentner, Dedre. 1989. The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. In: S. Vosniadou A. Ortony (Eds.). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p. 199-241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.011
Gentner, Dedre; Markman, Arthur B. 1994. Structural Alignment in Comparison: No Difference Without Similarity. Psychological Science, v. 5, p. 152-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00652.x
Gentner, Dedre; Markman, Arthur B. 1995. Similarity is Like Analogy: Structural Alignment in Comparison. Ln: C. Cacciari (Ed.). Similarity, p. 111-147. Brussels: BROPEL.
Gentner, Dedre; Markman, Arthur B. 1997. Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity. American Psychological Association, v. 52, n. 1, p. 45-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.52.1.45
Gick, Mary L.; Holyoak, Keith J. 1980. Analogical Problem-Solving. Cognitive Psychology, v. 12, p. 306–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
Goldstone, Robert L. 1994. Similarity, Interactive-Activation and Mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, v. 20, n. 1, p. 3-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.3
Goldstone, Robert L. 1994b. The Role of Similarity in Categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, v. 52, p. 125–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5
Guest, Ian. 2006. Harmonia (2 volumes): método prático. Rio de Janeiro: Lumiar.
Hahn, Ulrike; Chater, Nick; Richardson, Lucy B. 2003. Similarity as Transformation. Cognition, v. 87, p. 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00184-1
Hahn, Ulrike; Richardson, Lucy B. C.; Chater, Nick. 2001. Similarity: A Transformational Approach. In Johanna D. Moore, Keith Stenning (Eds.). Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 393-398.
Hampton, James A. 1995. Testing the Prototype Theory of Concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 34, p. 686–708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1031
Harrison, Daniel. 1994. Harmonic Function in Chromatic Music: A Renewed Dualist Theory and an Account of its Precedents. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Hodgetts, Carl J.; Hahn, Ulrike; Chater, Nick. 2009. Transformation and Alignment in Similarity. Cognition, v. 113, p. 62-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.010
Imai, Shiro. 1977. Pattern Similarity and Cognitive Transformations. Acta Psychologica, v. 41, p. 433-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(77)90002-6
Kahneman, Daniel; Tversky, Amos. 1984. Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, v. 39, p. 341-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.39.4.341
Kostka, Stefan; Payne, Dorothy. 2009. Tonal Harmony: with an Introduction to Twentieth-Century Music. Sixth Edition. New York: MacGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Krumhansl, Carol Lynne. 1978. Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data: The Interrelationship Between Similarity and Spatial Density. Psychological Review, v. 85, n. 5, p. 445-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.445
Krumhansl, Carol Lynne. 1979. The Psychological Representation of Musical Pitch in a Tonal Context. Cognitive Psychology, v. 11, p. 346-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90016-1
Krumhansl, Carol Lynne; Bharucha, Jamshed J.; Kessler, Edward J. 1982. Perceived Harmonic Structure of Chords in Three Related Musical Keys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, v. 8, n. 1, p. 24-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.8.1.24
Krumhansl, Carol Lynne; Cuddy, Lola L. 2010. A theory of Tonal Hierarchies in Music. In: M. R. Jones, Richard R. Fry and Arthur N. Popper (Eds.). Music Perception, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, v. 36, p. 51-87. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_3
Krumhansl, Carol Lynne; Kessler, Edward J. 1982. Tracing the Dynamic Changes in Perceived Tonal Organization in a Spatial Representation of Musical Keys. Psychological Review, v. 89, n. 4, p. 334-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.89.4.334
Krumhansl, Carol Lynne; Shepard, Roger N. 1979. Quantification of the Hierarchy of Tonal Functions within a Diatonic Context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, v. 5, n. 4, p. 579-594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.579
Li, Ming; Vitányi, Paul. 1997. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications. 2ª edition. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2606-0
Lindemann, Patricia G.; Markman, Arthur B. 1996. Alignability and Attribute Importance in Choice. In: G. Cottrell (Ed.). Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, p. 358-363. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Markman, Arthur B.; Gentner, Dedre. 1990. Analogical Mapping During Similarity Judgments. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, p. 38-44. Cambridge, MA.
Markman, Arthur B.; Gentner, Dedre. 1993a). All Differences are not Created Equal: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, p. 682-686.
Markman, Arthur B.; Gentner, Dedre. 1993b. Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity. Journal of Memory Language, v. 32, p. 517-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1027
Markman, Arthur B.; Gentner, Dedre. 1993c. Structural Alignment During Similarity Comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, v. 25, p. 431-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1011
Markman, Arthur B.; Gentner, Dedre. 1996. Commonalities and Differences in Similarity Comparisons. Memory & Cognition, v. 24, n. 2, p. 235-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200884
Markman, Arthur B.; Gentner, Dedre. 2000. Structure Mapping in the Comparison Process. American Journal of Psychology, v. 113, n. 4, p. 501-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1423470
Markman, Arthur B.; Medin, Douglas L. 1995. Similarity and Alignment in Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 63, p. 117-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1067
Marr, David; Poggio, Tomaso A. 1979. A Computational Theory of Human Stereo Vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, v. 204, p. 301-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0029
Medin, Douglas L.; Goldstone, Robert L.; Markman, Arthur B. 1995. Comparison and Choice: Relations Between Similarity Processing and Decision Processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, v. 2, p. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214410
Menezes, Flo. 2002. Apoteose de Schoenberg. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial.
Motte, Diether de la. 1998. Armonia. Tradução de Luis Romano Haces. Barcelona: Idea Musical.
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1986. Attention, Similarity and the Identification-Categorization Relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, v. 115, p. 39–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39
Novick, Laura R. 1990. Representational Transfer in Problem Solving. Psychological Science, v. 1, p. 128-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00081.x
Ottman, Robert W. 1992 [1961]. Advanced Harmony: Theory and Practice. Fourth Edition. USA: Prentice-hall.
Piston, Walter. 1987. Harmony. 5ª Edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Rameau, Jean Philippe. 1971 [1722]. Treatise on Harmony. Tradução de Philip Gosset. New York: Dover.
Ratner, Leonard G. 1962. Harmony: Structure and Style. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reed, Stephen K. 1972. Pattern Recognition and Categorization. Cognitive Psychology, v. 3, p. 382-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90014-X
Roig-Francolí, Miguel A. 2011. Harmony in Context. 2ª edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive Reference Points. Cognitive Psychology, v. 7, n. 4, p. 532-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90021-3
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of Categorization. In: Rosch E, Lloyd BB (Eds.). Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, Eleanor; Mervis, Carolyn B. 1975. Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology, v. 7, p. 573-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
Ross, Brian H. 1987. Thus is Like That: The Use of Earlier Problems and the Separation of Similarity Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v. 13, p. 629-639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.629
Ross, Brian H. 1989. Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v. 15, p. 456-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.3.456
Sadalla, Edward K.; Burroughs, W. Jeffrey; Staplin, Lorin J. 1980. Reference Points in Spatial Cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. v. 6, n. 5, p. 516-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.6.5.516
Schenker, Heinrich. 1954 [1906]. Harmony. Edited and annotated by Oswald Jonas. Translated by Elisabeth Mann Borgese. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 1954. Structural Functions of Harmony. Ed. Humphrey Searle. New York: W. W. Norton & Company – Inc.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 1978. Theory of Harmony. Tradução para o Inglês de Roy E. Carter. London: Faber & Faber.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 1999 [1969]. Structural Functions of Harmony. England: Faber and Faber.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 2001. Harmonia. Tradução de Marden Maluf. São Paulo: UNESP.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 2004. Funções Estruturais da Harmonia. Tradução de Eduardo Seincman. São Paulo: Via Lettera.
Sechter, Simon. 1853. Die Grunsätze der Musikalischen Composition. 3 Vols. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel. First volume edited and translated by Carl Christian Muller as The correct order of fundamental harmonies: a treatise on fundamental basses, and their inversions and substitute. New York: W. A. Pond, 1871. 12th ed., 1912.
Sjoberg, L. 1972. A Cognitive Theory of Similarity. Goteborg Psychological Reports, v. 2, n. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e453852004-001
Slovic, Paul; Macphillamy, Douglas. 1974. Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, v. 11, p. 172-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(74)90013-0
Smith, Charles J. 1981. Prolongations and Progressions as Musical Syntax. Music Theory: Special Topics, p. 139-74.
Smith, Charles J. 1986. The Functional Extravagance of Chromatic Chords. Music Theory Spectrum, v. 8, p. 94-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/746072
Smith, Edward E.; Medin, Douglas L. 1981. Concepts and Categories. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Smith, Edward E.; Osherson, Daniel N. 1989. Similarity and Decision Making. In: S. Vosniadou Ortony (Eds.). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p. 60-75. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.005
Temperley, David. 2018. The Musical Language of Rock. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190653774.001.0001
Tversky, Amos. 1972. Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice. Psychological Review, v. 70, p. 281-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955
Tversky, Amos. 1977. Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, v. 84, n. 4, p. 327-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.4.327
Tversky, Amos; Gati, Itamar. 2004 [1978]. Studies of Similarity. In: Eldar Shafir (Eds.). Preference, Belief, and Similarity: Selected Writings, p.75-95. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Tversky, Amos; Hutchinson, J. Wesley. 1986. Nearest Neighbor Analysis of Psychological Spaces. Psychological Review, v. 93, p. 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.93.1.3
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
• 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
• 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
• 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
• 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
• 5. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• 6. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
