Percepción de incidencia de políticas públicas en las áreas naturales protegidas marinas, en el desarrollo económico en cinco comunidades del Golfo de California, México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i7.2198Palavras-chave:
Desarrollo Sustentable, Buttom-up, Empoderamiento Comunitario, Grupos de Interés, Toma de DecisionesResumo
Las políticas públicas influencian el comportamiento de las comunidades originando cambios socio-económicos en la creación y aplicación de políticas orientadas a la conservación de la biodiversidad. En tres comunidades de Baja California y dos de Sinaloa del Golfo de California, México, se analizó la percepción de los pescadores, autoridades y científicos con respecto a la aplicación de las políticas públicas de conservación a través de entrevistas semiestructuradas, tomando como base el modelo del Banco Mundial. Se encontró que hay desconfianza con las políticas de conservación y diferencias en su aplicación. Las comunidades pesqueras tienen un papel relevante en la visión de futuro y desarrollo de las mismas. La toma de decisiones de sus miembros se vuelve un factor vital en el manejo de los recursos naturales, por lo que su participación es fundamental en las políticas públicas aplicadas para el cuidado y preservación de las áreas naturales protegidas marinas.
Downloads
Referências
Amigo-Dobaño, L.; Garza-Gil, D. M.; Varela-Lafuente, M. (2012). The perceptions of fisheries management options by Spain’s Atlantic fishermen. Marine Policy, 36(5), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.015
Barbier, E. B. (2010). Poverty, development, and environment. Environment & Development Economics, 15(06), 635–660. doi: 10.1017/s1355770x1000032x
Bavinck, M.; Jentoft, S.; Pascual-Fernández, J.J., Marciniak, B. (2015). Interactive coastal governance: The role of pre-modern fisher organizations in improving governability. Ocean & Coastal Management, 117, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.012.
Curtis, A.; Lockwood, M. (2000). Landcare and catchment management in Australia: lessons for state-sponsored community participation. Society and Natural Resources, 13, 61e73. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200279243
Chaigneau, T.; Daw, T. M. (2015). Individual and village-level effects on community support for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in the Philippines. Marine Policy, 51, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.007
Coll, M.; Carreras, M.; Ciércoles, C.; Cornax, M. J.; Gorelli, G.; Morote, E.; Sáez, R. (2014). Assessing fishing and marine biodiversity changes using fishers' perceptions: The spanish mediterranean and gulf of Cadiz case study. PLoS One, 9(1), e85670. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085670
Dubois, M.; Hadjimichael, M.; Raakjær, J. (2016). The rise of the scientific fisherman: Mobilising knowledge and negotiating user rights in the Devon inshore brown crab fishery, UK. Marine Policy, 65, 48-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.013
Farr, E. R.; Stoll, J. S.; Beitl, C. M. (2018). Effects of fisheries management on local ecological knowledge. Ecology & Society, 23(3), p.15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10344-230315Flick, U. (2007). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata, S. L.
Gurney, G. G.; Cinner, J.; Ban, N. C.; Pressey, R. L.; Pollnac, R.; Campbell, S. J; Setiawan, F. (2014). Poverty and protected areas: An evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.003
Halliday A.; Glaser M. (2011). A Management perspective on social ecological systems: a generic system model and its application to a case study from Peru. Human Ecology Review, 18, 1–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24707682
IEP, Institute for Economics and Peace. (2015). Peace and corruption. http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Peace-andCorruption.pdf.
Lakatos, I. (1993). La metodología de los Programas de investigación científica. Alianza. Madrid.
Kusumawati, I.; Huang, H. W. (2015). Key factors for successful management of marine protected areas: A comparison of stakeholders’ perception of two MPAs in Weh island, Sabang, Aceh, Indonesia. Marine Policy, 51, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.029
Manjarrez-Bringas, N.; Aragón-Noriega, E. A.; Beltrán-Morales, L. F.; Cordoba-Matson, M. V: Ortega-Rubio, A. (2018). Lessons for Sustainable Development: Marine Mammal Conservation Policies and Its Social and Economic Effects. Sustainability, 10(7), 2185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072185
Nunan, F. (2006). Empowerment and institutions: Managing fisheries in Uganda. World Development, 34(7), 1316-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.016
Onaindia, M.; Ballesteros, F.; Alonso, G.; Monge-Ganuzas, M.; Peña, L. (2013). Participatory process to prioritize actions for a sustainable management in a biosphere reserve. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.012
ONU, Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2004). Against Corruption. United Nations Convention. Austria
Paraskevopoulos, C.J.; Leonardi, R. (2004). Introduction: adaptational pressures and social learning in European regional policy – cohesion (Greece, Ireland and Portugal) vs. CEE (Hungary, Poland) countries. Regional and Federal Studies, 14(3), 315-354. DOI: 10.1080/1359756042000261342
Parrot, L.; Chion, C.; Gonzales, R.; Latombe, G. (2012). Agents, individuals, and networks: modeling methods to inform natural resource management in regional landscapes. Ecology & Society, 17(32), 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04936-170332
Penalva Verdú, C.; Alaminos Chica, A.; Francés García, F. J.; Santacreu Fernández, O. A. (2015). La investigación cualitativa. Técnicas de investigación y análisis con Atlas.ti. Ecuador: Pydlos Ediciones.
Pita, C.; Pierce, G.J.; Theodossiou, I. (2010). Stakeholders’ participation in the fisheries management decision-making process: Fishers’ perceptions of participation. Marine Policy, 34 (5), 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.009
Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A.; Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. (2015). Bottom-up perspectives on nature conservation systems: The differences between regional and local administrations. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.010
Prager, K.; Nienaber, B.; Neumann, B.; Phillips, A. (2015). How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management? Journal of Rural Studies, 37, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.006
Rodríguez-Quiroz, G.; Bracamonte, A. (2008) Pertinencia de las ANP como política de conservación y mejoramiento de la calidad de vida. Análisis de percepción en la Reserva de la Biosfera del Alto Golfo de California y Delta del Río Colorado. Estudios Sociales, 16(32): 143-177
Sánchez-Molina, A. A.; Murillo-Garza, a. (2021) Enfoques metodológicos en la investigación histórica: cuantitativa, cualitativa y comparative. Debates por la historia, 9(2): 147-181
Shleifer, A; Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599-617. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-5533%28199308%29108%3A3%3C599%3AC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8&origin=JSTOR-pdf
Schliep, R.; Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2010). Assessing governance of biosphere reserves in Central Europe. Land Use Policy, 27(3), 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.005
Steinkoenig, Z. (2018). A Thematic Analysis of Fisherfolk and Local Government Unit Officials’ Interviews On Marine Protected Area Management In Tanon Strait, Philippines. Thesis for the Degree Master of Science in Environment.
Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. New York, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Torre, J.; Hernandez-Velasco, A.; Fernandez Rivera-Melo, F.; Lopez, J.: Espinosa-Romero, M. J. (2019). Women’s empowerment, collective actions, and sustainable fisheries: lessons from Mexico. Maritime Studies. 18, 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00153-2
Valles, M. (1997). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid: síntesis s.a.
Vásquez-León, M. (2012). Policies on conservation and sustainable development: fishing communities in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Neoliberalism and commodity production in Mexico. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. pp. 165-186.
Vázquez-León, C. I. (2019). Políticas públicas y el estado de crisis en la región del alto golfo de California, México. Región & Sociedad, e1227. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2019/31/1227
World Bank. (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001. Oxford University Press. En http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/230351468332946759/pdf/226840WDR00PUB0ng0poverty0200002001.pdf
Zukowski, S.; Curtis, A.; Watts, R. J. (2011). Using fisher local ecological knowledge to improve management: The Murray crayfish in Australia. Fisheries Research, 110(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.03.020
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 José Alberto Monárrez Ramírez, Mario del Roble Pensado Leglise, Gerardo Rodríguez Quiroz, Luis Alfredo Gallardo Millán
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
• 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
• 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
• 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
• 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
• 5. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• 6. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
