Risk assessment of failure on the correct choice of universities patent quality indicators: a systematic literature review





Universities Patent, Quality Indicators, Risk Assessment


Currently, most universities use some indicators to measure the quality of patents. The quality of the metrics may impact sustainability in universities. It is observed that research on patent quality indicators and risk assessment in selecting it can be a relevant contribution to improving the invention-innovation relationship. Moreover, developing ways to evaluate their quality can enhance the results of academic research. The study presents the influential publications in the Patent Quality Indicators, what are the indicators of patent quality for universities, and their potential for generating technological Innovation. The study also presents the risks in choosing Patent Quality Indicators. A systematic literature review was conducted in the University's Patent Quality Indicators and popular digital databases, such as IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Science Direct, Springer Link, and Web of Science (WoS). The sample size is appropriate and significant since all the studied areas are covered. As a result, the ten most significant publications found in the review and a list of the risks are presented. The study can help universities better understand the patent quality indicators and prioritize allocating resources to treat the risks. This study contributes to other researchers' previous findings since most did not cover a systematic literature review and a risk assessment in choosing indicators. This paper aimed to fill this gap by presenting the significant publications and the risks involved. It is believed that the present study will augment the knowledge of the professors and academic professionals in the decision-making process


Não há dados estatísticos.


Aristodemou, L.; Tietze, F. (2018). The state-of-the-art on Intellectual Property Analytics (I.P.A.): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analyzing intellectual property (I.P.) data. World Patent Information, 55, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.07.002

Arts, S.;Cassiman, B.; Gomez, J. C. (2017). Text Matching to Measure Patent Similarity. Strategic Management Journal 39 (1): 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2699

Barbastefano, R. G.; Souza, C. G.; Araújo, F. O. (2010). Interação universidade-empresa: Análise de Padrões de Depósitos Conjuntos e Desafios ao Patenteamento Universitário no Brasil. XXX Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção Maturidade e desafios da Engenharia de Produção: competitividade das empresas, condições de trabalho, meio ambiente. São Carlos, SP Brasil. https://abepro.org.br/biblioteca/enegep2010_TN_STO_120_780_17252.pdf

Boasson, V.; Boasson, E. (2015). Firm value, spatial knowledge flow, and Innovation: evidence from patent citations. China Finance Review International Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 132-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-08-2014-0056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-08-2014-0056

Boeing, P.; Mueller, E. (2016). Measuring Patent Quality in Cross-Country Comparison. Economics Letters 149, 145–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.039

Briggs, K.; Buehler, D. L. (2019). An Analysis of Technologically Radical Innovation and Breakthrough Patents. International Journal of the Economics of Business 25 (3): 341–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1438873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1438873

Bronwyn, H.; Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M. (2015). Market Value and Patent Citations. The RAND Journal of Economics 36, (1) 16–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1593752.

Caro, A. M., Lucio, I. F. and Gracia, A. G. (2003). University Patents: Output and Input Indicators … of What? Research Evaluation 12 (1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154403781776744

Caviggioli, F.; De Marco, F. A.; Montobbio, F.; Ughetto, E. (2020). The Licensing and Selling of Inventions by U.S. Universities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 159: 120189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120189

Chlomoudis, C.; Styliadis, T. (2022). Innovation and Patenting within Containerized Liner Shipping. Sustainability 14 (2): 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020892

Dahab, S.; Darwich, L.; Quintela, R.; Medeiros, J. A. and Atas, L.. (1995). Competitividade e Capacitação Tecnológica para a pequena e média empresa. Salvador: Casa da Qualidade.

Dallacorte C.; Jacoski A. (2016). Avaliação do desenvolvimento econômico e ligação com patentes: estudo de caso para mensurar inovação em municípios. R. Divulg. Cient., 21, 1, p. 64-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24302/agora.v21i1.1103

Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (2019). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Research Policy 29 (2): 109–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Ferri, S.; Fiorentino, R.; Parmentola, A.; Sapio, A. (2019). Patenting or Not? The Dilemma of Academic Spin-off Founders. Business Process Management Journal 25 (1): 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-06-2017-0163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0163

Haase, E.; Araújo, C.; Dias, J. (2009). Inovações Vistas Pelas Patentes: Exigências Frente Às Novas Funções Das Universidade. Revista Brasileira de Inovação 4 (2): 329. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v4i2.8648916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v4i2.8648916

Hall, B. H.; Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M. (2002). The NBER patent-citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools, in A. B. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg, eds, Patents, Citations, and Innovations. A Widow on the Knowledge Economy, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, pp. 403–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w8498

Kamiyama, S.; Sheehan, J.; Martinez, C. (2006). Valuation and Exploitation of Intellectual Property, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2006/05, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/307034817055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/307034817055

Kolympiris, C.; Klein, P. G. (2017). The Effects of Academic Incubators on University Innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 11 (2): 145–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1242

Kürtössy, J. (2004). Innovation Indicators Derived from Patent Data. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences 12 (1):91-101.

Lance, D. E. (1967). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1966. Pp. XV 332. Business History Review, 41 (1): 110–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3112425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3112425

Lei, X.; Chen, D. Y.; Huang, M.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, R. (2017). An analysis of innovation competitiveness of China through patent analysis. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. 17(2), pp. 17–32. Available at: https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/1888

Lu, L.; Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Strategic challenges for creating knowledge‐based Innovation in China: Transforming triple helix university‐government‐industry relations. Journal of Technology Management in China, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770810851476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770810851476

MacLaurin, W. R. (1953). The Sequence from Invention to Innovation and Its Relation to Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67, 1, 97, https://doi.org/10.2307/1884150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884150

Martínez, C. (2010). Patent Families: When Do Different Definitions Really Matter? Scientometrics 86 (1): 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0251-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0251-3

Mowery, C.; Sampat, B. N. (2006). Universities in National Innovation Systems. Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press (2006) https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0008

Mowery, C.; Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic Patent Quality and Quantity before and after the Bayh–Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy 31 (3): 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00116-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0

Mueller, S. P. M.; Perucchi, V. (2014). Universidades E a Produção de Patentes: Tópicos de Interesse Para O Estudioso Da Informação Tecnológica. Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informação 19 (2): 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/1828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/1828

Narin, F. (2000). Assessing Technological Competencies. From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence, April, 155–95. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860943058_0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860943058_0007

Nishimura, J.; Okamuro, H. (2011). R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9148-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9148-9

OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en

OECD. (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056442-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056442-en

OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en

Owen-Smith, J.; Powell, W. W. (2003). The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity. Research Policy 32 (9): 1695–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00045-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00045-3

Povoa, L. M. C. (2006). Depósitos de Patentes de Universidades Brasileiras (1979 - 2004), Proceedings of the 12th Seminar on the Economy of Minas Gerais, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdp:diam06:006

Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005

Sampat, N.; Mowery, D. C.; Ziedonis, A. A. (2003). Changes in University Patent Quality after the Bayh–Dole Act: A Re-Examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (9): 1371–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7187(03)00087-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0

Schmookler, J. (1960). An Economist Takes Issue. Technology and Culture, JSTOR 1 (3): 214. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3101389

Sterzi, V. (2013). Patent Quality and Ownership: An Analysis of U.K. Faculty Patenting. Research Policy 42 (2): 564–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.010

Subramanian, M.; Lim, K.; Soh, P. (2013). When Birds of a Feather Don't Flock Together: Different Scientists and the Roles They Play in Biotech R&D Alliances. Research Policy 42 (3): 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.002

Sun, Y.; Zhang, C.; Kok, R. A. W. (2020). The role of research outcome quality in the relationship between university research collaboration and technology transfer: empirical results from China. Scientometrics 122, 1003–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03330-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03330-6

Taques, F. H.; López, M. G.; Basso, L. F.; Areal, N. (2020). Indicators Used to Measure Service Innovation and Manufacturing Innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001

Tseng, F, Hsieh, C., Peng, Y, Chu, Y. (2011). Using Patent Data to Analyze Trends and the Technological Strategies of the Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Solar Cell Industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (2): 332–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.010

Verspagen, B. (2006). University Research, Intellectual Property Rights and European Innovation Systems. Journal of Economic Surveys 20 (4): 607–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00261.x

WIPO. (n.d.) World Intellectual Property Report. www.wipo.int. Accessed September 27, 2022. https://www.wipo.int/wipr/en/.




Como Citar

Leonidio, U. da C., Pereira, J. C., de Souza, C. G., Cardoso, D. de O., Julião, M. da S., Ferreira, H. M. G., dos Santos, V. C., & Marques, R. A. (2023). Risk assessment of failure on the correct choice of universities patent quality indicators: a systematic literature review. Revista De Gestão E Secretariado, 14(5), 7661–7682. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i5.2144