Estudo bibliométrico da produção científica internacional sobre empreendedorismo digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v13i2.1236Keywords:
Empreendedorismo digital. Transformação digital. Redes bibliométricas.Abstract
O objetivo desta pesquisa foi mapear a produção científica internacional sobre empreendedorismo digital. Para alcançar esse propósito, foi conduzida uma pesquisa do tipo exploratória, descritiva e bibliométrica, com abordagem quantitativa. A mensuração da produção científica foi baseada nas três leis clássicas da bibliometria: Lei de Bradford, Lei de Zipf e Lei de Lotka. O estudo seguiu as etapas definidas por Sousa, Fontenele, Silva e Filho (2019) para a condução de pesquisas bibliométricas, a saber: seleção da base de dados e do software bibliométrico, definição da amostra, levantamento da amostra, tabulação e tratamento de dados descritivos, e análise dos dados. Os dados foram coletados do banco de dados da Web Of Science e tabulados no software Excel. Para analisar as redes bibliométricas de coocorrência de palavras-chave e de citação (autores e periódicos) utilizou-se o software VOS Viewer. Este estudo mostra de forma geral as principais correntes temáticas exploradas em cenário internacional sobre o empreendedorismo digital: Transformação Digital, Estratégia, Data Science e Inovação Digital. Também sinaliza outros aspectos relacionados ao construto, oferecendo um respaldo teórico para outras pesquisas, sobretudo para ampliar o campo do conhecimento sobre o assunto analisado.
Downloads
References
Balocco, R., Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2019). Lean business models change process in digital entrepreneurship. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1520–1542. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2018-0194
Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Kraus, S., & Damke, E. J. (2019). Dynamics of digital entrepreneurship and the innovation ecosystem: A multilevel perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2019-0397
Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy and Leadership, 40(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571211209314
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
Bouncken, R. B., Kraus, S., & Martínez-Pérez, J. F. (2020). Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: the emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(4), 1465–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00689-4
Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., Dell’Era, C., & Pellizzoni, E. (2019). Fostering digital entrepreneurship from startup to scaleup: The role of venture capital funds and angel groups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145(August 2018), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.022.
Cintra, F. C. (2010). Marketing Digital: a era da tecnologia on-line. Investigação, 10(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.26843/investigacao.v10i1.147
Coraiola, D. M., Mello, C. M. de, & Jacometti, M. (2012). Estruturação da estratégia-como-prática organizacional: possibilidades analíticas a partir do institucionalismo organizacional. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 13(5), 204–231. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-69712012000500008
Ferreira, K. M., Mexas, M. P., Abreu, W., & Mello, P. L. (2016). Economia compartilhada e consumo colaborativo: uma revisão de literatura. Artigo apresentado no XII Congresso Nacional Em Excelência Em Gestão & III INOVARSE - Responsabilidade Social Aplicada, 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Franzoni, G. B., & Da Silva, T. N. (2016). Inovação Social e Tecnologia Social: o caso da Cadeia Curta de Agricultores Familiares e a Alimentação Escolar em Porto Alegre/RS. Desenvolvimento Em Questão, 14(37), 353. https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2016.37.353-386
Ghezzi, A. (2019). Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146(December 2017), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.017
Ghezzi, A., & Cavallo, A. (2020). Agile Business Model Innovation in Digital Entrepreneurship: Lean Startup Approaches. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 110(March 2020), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.013
Gomes, G. de S., & Neto, J. D. de O. (2017). Bibliometria como suporte aos processos de pesquisa – uma contribuição didática à área contábil. Proceedings of the 14th CONTECSI International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(May), 889–910. https://doi.org/10.5748/9788599693131-14contecsi/ps-4507
Hagberg, J., Sundstrom, M., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2016). The digitalization of retailing: an exploratory framework. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(7), 694–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-09-2015-0140
Kim, K., Mithas, S., & Kimbrough, M. (2017). Information Technology Investments And Firm Risk Across Industries: Evidence From The Bond Market. Mis Quarterly, 41(4), 1347-1367. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ%2F2017%2F41.4.15
Kleine, D. (2013). Technologies of Choice? – ICTs, development and the capabilities approach (MIT Press (ed.)).
Knutas, A., Hajikhani, A., Salminen, J., Ikonen, J., & Porras, J. (2015). Cloud-based bibliometric analysis service for systematic mapping studies. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 25(June 2015),184–191. https://doi.org/10.1145/2812428.2812442
Kraus, S., Palmer, C., Kailer, N., Kallinger, F. L., & Spitzer, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 25(2), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2018-0425
Kraus, S., Roig-Tierno, N., & Bouncken, R. B. (2019). Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 13(3), 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00333-8
Law, D. (2020). Conhecendo a Lei De Dados Do Brasil. Recuperado em 7 junho, 2020, de https://www.daniel-ip.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Daniel_Cartilha_LGPD_atual_fev2019.pdf
Marques, L. da S., Kniess, C. T., Meira, S. R., & Ruiz, M. S. (2017). A Pesquisa em Estratégia e Sustentabilidade: Proposta de Agenda de Pesquisa a Partir de um Estudo Bibliométrico. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 16(03), 05–21. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v16i3.2544
Mendes, N. S., Caldas, T., & Ata, G. (2011). Alinhamento Estratégico entre Negócios e Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação em Micro e Pequenas Empresas de Base Tecnológica. Encontro de Estudos Em Estratégia. Artigo apresentado no V Encontro de Estudos em Estratégia, 2011, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Mithas, S., Agarwal, R., & Courtney, H. (2012). Digital business strategies and the duality of IT. IT Professional, 14(5), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2012.96
Mithas, S., Tafti, A., & Mitchell, W. (2013). How A Firm’s Competitive Environment And Digital Strategic Posture Influence Digital Business Strategy. Mis Quarterly, 37(2), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.09
Moreira, P. S. da C., Guimarães, A. J. R., & Tsunoda, D. F. (2020). Qual Ferramenta Bibliométrica Escolher? um estudo comparativo entre softwares. P2P E Inovação, 6(March), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.21721/p2p.2020v6n2.p140-158.
Machado Junior, C., de Souza, M. T. S., Parisotto, I. R.S., & Palmisano, A. (2016). As leis da bibliometria em diferentes bases de dados científicos. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 18(44), 111-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p111
Porter, M. E. (1991). Estratégia competitiva: técnicas para análise de indústrias e da concorrência (Campus (ed.)).
Teixeira Filho, N. (2012). Estudo do impacto do uso das metodologias ágeis no planejamento em sala de aula. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
Oliveira, A. A. S., Queiroz Neto, R. R. de, Queiroz, J. D. F. A., & Duarte, S. (2019). Empreendedorismo Digital: Suas Contribuições No Âmbito Econômico E Social. Organizações e Sociedade, 8(9), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.29031/ros.v8i9.436
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006
Richter, C., Kraus, S., & Syrjä, P. (2015). The Smart City as an opportunity for entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 7(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2015.071481
Sanasi, S., Ghezzi, A., Cavallo, A., & Rangone, A. (2020). Making sense of the sharing economy: a business model innovation perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32(8), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1719058
Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship and its role in innovation systems: A systematic literature review as a basis for future research avenues for sustainable transitions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7), 27-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072764
Secundo, G., Rippa, P., & Cerchione, R. (2020). Digital Academic Entrepreneurship: A structured literature review and avenue for a research agenda. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 157(1), 01-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120118
Silva, M. R. Da, Hayashi, C. R. M., & Hayashi, M. C. P. I. (2011). Análise bibliométrica e cientométrica: desafios para especialistas que atuam no campo. Revista de Ciência Da Informação E Documentação, 2(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2178-2075.v2i1p110-129
Sousa, E. da S., Fontenele, R. E. S., Silva, Á. L. L., & Filho, J. M. de S. (2019). Mapeamento da produção científica internacional sobre intenção empreendedora Mappingthe international scientific production about entrepreneurial. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 10(3), 114–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v10i3.901
Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., Warkentin, M., & Michael Chung, H. (2002). Electronic Commerce 2002: A Managerial Perspective (P. College (ed.)).
Vallaster, C., Kraus, S., Kailer, N., & Baldwin, B. (2019). Responsible entrepreneurship: outlining the contingencies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 25(3), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0206
Ylijoki, O., Sirkiä, J., Porras, J., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2019). Innovation capabilities as a mediator between big data and business model. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488289.2018.1548396
Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: An interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148(June), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119735
Zhao, F. (2005). Exploring the synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550510580825
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311406265
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Paloma Rayanne Silva Bezerra, Sandra Maria Araújo de Souza, Geuda A. Da Costa Gonçalves

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
• 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
• 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
• 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
• 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
• 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
• 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html